File upload failed: invalid data.

Council rejects bid to regulate music choices at Dinkytown bar

November 03, 2006

An attempt to dictate what style of music a Dinkytown restaurant can play sparked a lively debate on free speech at Friday’s City Council meeting.

Third Ward Council Member Diane Hofstede sought to amend a liquor license agreement between the city and the Loring Pasta Bar that would stipulate that any live music played at the bar on Mondays and Tuesdays would be the same style as that which is performed there the rest of the week. But that struck 10th Ward Council Member Ralph Remington, who represents dozens of bars in the Uptown area, as unreasonable.

“Can we regulate this?” he asked city attorney Jay Heffern. “It seems like a constitutional question to me.”

Heffern assured Remington that it was within the city’s rights to dictate the sort of music a bar can feature, because it’s related to the bar’s operation. “I think it’s appropriate,” he said.

Hofstede explained that she was only trying to provide the sort of atmosphere the neighborhood would prefer, noting that the restaurant’s owner, Jason McLean, had agreed to the stipulation. But Lisa Goodman, whose ward includes downtown, said it would create a dangerous precedent that would affect hundreds of bars. “This takes us down the road to a very slippery slope,” she said. “I can only imagine the trouble I’m going to have downtown now.”

Goodman suggested that any concerns about the type of music played at a bar should be addressed through the city’s noise ordinance, and not as a condition of a liquor license.

Hofstede offered to drop language referring to the style of music performed and stipulate instead that any “substantial” change to a bar’s entertainment would be subject to city approval, but that, too, was a nonstarter, as council members argued it was too vague to be enforceable.

With little support among her colleagues, Hofstede agreed to send the matter back to committee for more discussion.


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on November 6, 2006 - 09:52.

The Loring features Hip-Hop one tuesday a month, and they get a big crowd.

Kudos to the council for recognizing there are limits to their power and additional kudos for not adding an additional level of complexity/restriction to liquor licenses.

Boo to Hofstede for even flotaing this nonsense. Is this another moment where we say, "She sounded so reasonable during the election, but I guess she's another neighborhood activist/liberal wingnut?"

Paul Zerbt redux?

To the rest of the City Council & assorted policy wonks:

This case, and the issue of Music at the 331, both speak to the need for Mpls to resolve some of the inconsistencies in our live music regulations.

First, pick a vision and stick to it. Are we a 24 hour city, an arts mecca, an entertainment destination? If indeed, we are, or aspire to be, then live music venues are critical to that type of development. Joe and Jane on the street want to hear that music!

If you aspire to be Richfield-North, then by all means, restrict away. Like I always say, there's nothing like a patchwork of reguations today to satisfy the whiners , and create a hell of a mess for the leaders & citizens of tommorrow.

Also, the classifications of entertainment licenses themselves are too complex. Here are my suggestions:

Class D: No entertainment.

Class C: Karaoke, Spoken Word, Stand-Up Comedy, Bands with 3 performers or fewer(amplification allowed for vocals, and acoustic instruments. No electronic instruments.)

Class B: Bands of any size or instrumentation. Theatrical performances.

Class A: Adult entertainment.

Licenses should be granted based on the size of th commercial parcel, and proximity to residences, churches, communitty centers, and schools.

And of course, active enforement of the noise ordinance would be expected.