File upload failed: invalid data.

Northeast bar gets court reprieve in topless dancing case

May 19, 2006

Citing constitutional questions, federal district court has issued a preliminary injunction barring the city of Minneapolis from shutting down the topless dancing at 22nd Avenue Station, one of the city’s last two venues for so-called adult entertainment outside of downtown.

As Kerry Ashmore reports in the Northeaster, the ruling from Judge Michael Davis allows the bar to continue offering topless dancing while it continues its court challenge to the city’s zoning ordinance.

The bar has been offering the entertainment with a waiver from the city since 2002, but last year an administrative law judge advised the city to begin enforcing the ordinance at the last two holdouts: 22nd Avenue Station, at 22nd and University avenues in Northeast, and at BJ’s on West Broadway on the North Side. BJ’s has since agreed to stop the dancing by the end of the year.

But Judge Davis said he could not “conclusively” decide whether the city’s ordinance passed constitutional muster, noting that the bar owner Glen Peterson had “raised serious doubts” about the law. Among the issues is whether the entertainment creates any “adverse secondary effects” in the neighborhood. Davis said the city had not adequately proven that such effects exist.

The city will have a chance to prove its case at an upcoming pre-trial conference, though attorney Randall Tigue, who is representing the bar, doubts they will be able to do so. “There is no such evidence,” he said.


Submitted by Minneapolis Business Owner (not verified) on May 22, 2006 - 14:31.

I'm glad someone has shown the gumption, and spent the money, to fight City Hall on a zoning issue.

Those of you who don't own a business probably have no idea about the regulatory climate in this city, but it is often political, sometimes arbitrary, and occasionally so weird, mysterious, and ominous that it makes doing business here a trial, at times.

I'm not even a fan of topless dancing, but I am a fan of equal enforcement, and not enforcement based on politics, personal relationships, or the size of my organization. Yes, folks, believe it or not, in this bastion of the DFL, large corporations have a mind numbing advantage over the little guy, at our City Hall.

Corps have the staff, time, and money to navigate the maze of regulations and codes, and what's more, our city staff generally prefers to work with them, over a new guy with no clue. Yeah for big business.

What's even worse, and makes me boil with rage, is how it seems like everyone ay City Hall circles the wagons when it looks like one of them may be in the wrong. I guess I'm naive, but I thought everyone, including the city Attorney, worked for the citizens, but no, they work for the CITY, and mother city must be protected so that all may continue to suckle from her teat.

Bravo to the Double Deuce! Stick it to the man. Maybe you can put a chink in the City's armor that others can exploit.