File upload failed: invalid data.

Zoned Out

June 01, 2006

Residents of Northeast Minneapolis have worked for years on reshaping the look and feel of Central Avenue, which has fallen on hard times since its heyday as a prime cruising strip for hot-rodding teens in the Fifties and Sixties. So it was ironic to note the recent hubbub over a retro-styled Porky’s drive-in proposed for a vacant piece of property next to the Second Precinct police station at 19th and Central.

It seems the developer of the new Porky’s required a zoning change in order to legally build the hamburger joint next to the police station, but due to the city’s Byzantine zoning code, that zoning change was not possible without also rezoning the police station.

Of course, rezoning the city’s own property for the benefit of a private developer did not sit well with the opponents of the proposed Porky’s, who were not happy about that fact that the new restaurant wasn’t actually going to be a drive-in, but more of a drive-thru. This raised issues of increased traffic and noise at a time when the neighborhood organization was working to make Central Avenue more pedestrian-friendly.

Supporters of the plan, like Council Member Paul Ostrow, argued that the decision to rezone the city’s property was not simply for the benefit of Porky’s and added that there would be plenty of time for the residents to weigh in on the matter. After all, the developer will have to come back through the appropriate committees for conditional use permits and such. “There’s plenty of time to address those issues,” he said. “Let’s make this project a model.”

Or maybe not. Prior to the final vote, Council Member Gary Schiff questioned whether city officials had allowed the 60-day rule governing zoning applications to expire, thereby automatically granting permission. Had someone sent out an letter to the developer extending the deadline for deciding the matter? he asked.

No one was sure, so Ostrow moved to return the matter to committee while the staff figured it out. That passed on an 8–3 vote.

Later, we learned that the deadline had, indeed, passed and that the rezoning of the police station would go forward, thus allowing Porky’s to go forward, thus vindicating the system after all.


Submitted by Matt (not verified) on June 6, 2006 - 17:11.

Paul Ostrow is a Weasel. Turning this site into a fast food drive-thru is inappropriate. He and the developers for Porky's should be ashamed of themselves for using the senior citizens at the nursing home on 18th and Central as pawns in their plan to show that they have neighborhood support for this project. The neighborhood does not support a fast food drive thru. This is poor city planning.

Submitted by Chris (not verified) on June 5, 2006 - 14:43.

Vindicating the system?!?!

The Minneapolis zoning code may be byzantine, but it has checks and balances built into it. What the Mayor, CM Ostrow and the Northeast Community Development Council have engineered is an end-run around a carefully designed system that was created to stop innappropriate land uses in sensitive areas. What our elected officials and a rogue development agency (created by said elected officials and effectively closed to neighborhood input) have done is insulting to the dedicated neighborhood volunteers who have worked tirelessly for years to support the Central Avenue rennaissance. This project is a classic example of elected officials supporting a developer and ignoring the opinion of their constituents.

Had the author of this article done his/her homework, he would see that the cities' own plan for the Central Avenue Mainstreet Project (CAMP) does not support this kind of development.

Submitted by dave (not verified) on June 3, 2006 - 11:49.

Ostrow moved the matter back to committee because he knew he did not have the 7 votes to get the Polize rezoning approved. Hopefully the City Council will realize that having a Fast-Food Drive Thru doesn't coincide with the City's vision for Central Avenue.

And its very strange how a matter like this didn't even appear in committee until AFTER the 60 day rule had expired....

Submitted by Mark Koscielski (not verified) on June 6, 2006 - 23:20.

The 60 day rule is use for, when the city wants something and the people don't want it. The city will sit on the ass and wait for the time to run out and will say opps, sorry about that. This is not the first time they have done this and it won't be the last.